As an Atlanta probate attorney, I have assisted many clients regarding the estate of a loved one who was likely unduly influenced to create a will that did not reflect their true intentions. Undue influence is when someone uses their relationship with a testator (creator of a will) in order to convince them to write their will in such a way that it favors the influencer. A claim of undue influence can be supported by a variety of evidence, including “a confidential relation (relationship in which one party exerts power or “a controlling influence” over the other) between the parties, the [un]reasonableness of the disposition of the testator’s estate, old age, or disease affecting the strength of the mind.” The case Bailey v. Edmundson provides us with a concrete example of undue influence. After her father, Raymond Cudworth, passed away, Heather Bailey filed a will for probate which named her executrix and primary beneficiary. However, his caregivers, a Michael Edmundson among them, filed a different will for probate which they claim was executed in 2004, after the will Bailey filed. The will filed by Edmundson left bequests to Edmundson and the other caregivers and significantly reduced the amount of estate… [Read More]
Georgia Probate Attorney: Conflicts of Interest That Can Disqualify an Executor
It is important that the executor of an estate is chosen carefully and is a person who can unbiasedly act in the best interests of the estate. So what happens when the named executor in a will presents a conflict of interest? O.C.G.A. § 53-7-55 allows the court the discretion to deny issuance of or to revoke letters testamentary when good cause, like a conflict of interest, is shown. For examples of conflicts of interest, we will look to the cases of In re: Estate of Moriarty and In re: Estate of Farkas. In In re: Estate of Moriarty, Catherine Moriarty petitioned to be executor of the estate of her husband, Edward Moriarty. Catherine was named executor in Edward’s will. However, Edward’s daughter, Maureen Weare, filed a caveat and petitioned to have Moriarty disqualified as executor, because Catherine had a conflict of interest with her representation of the estate. Catherine was not a beneficiary under the terms of the will; however, she did maintain a joint account with Edward which she claimed was payable to her by right of survivorship (i.e. not a part of the estate). After the Court disqualified her as executor, Catherine appealed the decision, stating that… [Read More]
Atlanta Probate Lawyer: Recovering Attorney’s Fees for Actions Taken on Behalf of an Estate
For many people, the thought of the fees associated with hiring an attorney can be a stressor. However, when deciding to pursue legal action in an estate, potential clients should be aware that there is legal precedent for reimbursement of attorney’s fees from the estate’s funds. These fees can be legal fees for the normal course of events in the distribution of an estate or even legal fees as a result of contesting/removing a current personal representative. The Official Code of Georgia Annotated (OCGA) provides in §53-7-45 that “personal representatives [of an estate] are authorized to compromise, adjust, arbitrate, assign, sue or defend, abandon, or otherwise deal with or settle debts or claims in favor of or against the estate.” If the personal representative does not want to pursue a matter, they can assign the matter to a creditor or heir/beneficiary who can then pursue it on their behalf. If that person succeeds in her pursuit and thereby brings funds into the estate her attorney’s fees and expenses may be reimbursed from the estate. The case Estes v. Collum provides an example of a different kind of situation which may warrant an award of attorney’s fees. In Estes, the estate administrator was wrongfully holding property… [Read More]
Georgia Probate Lawyer: How Can I Know if an Executor Has Breached Their Fiduciary Duty?
As an Atlanta probate attorney, I have assisted many clients with performing their duty as executor of an estate. The job of being executor can be difficult because fiduciary duty is not easily defined or understood, especially to a layperson. An executor’s position is defined in the law as being “of the highest trust and confidence to heirs at law, and [an executor] is required to act in entire good faith.” However, this is not a very specific description, and it’s difficult to know what constitutes “the highest trust.” In order to better understand what a breach of fiduciary duty can be, we can look to the case Greenway v. Hamilton. Stanley Greenway was appointed the executor of his mother’s estate following her death. Greenway’s niece, Dina Hamilton, filed a petition for accounting following Greenway’s distribution of the estate. Greenway provided an accounting, to which Hamilton had objections. The probate court held a hearing on the matter and found that Greenway had breached his fiduciary duty, a position which was upheld by the Supreme Court of Georgia on appeal. Here are specific examples of how Greenway breached his duty: Greenway sold estate property to his wife for significantly less than… [Read More]
Georgia Probate Attorney: Choosing the Executor of Your Estate Wisely
As an Atlanta probate attorney, I have witnessed the consequences of a poorly-chosen executor on the administration of an estate. Choosing who will be the executor of your estate is a big decision, and your executor shouldn’t be chosen based on who is your closest family member or friend but on who is qualified for the job and will be able to best administer your estate. An executor of an estate has a serious fiduciary obligation and should be chosen wisely. Executors are responsible for the timely and competent administration of an estate. Their duties include probating the will in the court which holds jurisdiction, accounting for all of the money held in the estate, paying estate taxes, and managing costs associated with funerals and other matters. Therefore, your pick for executor needs to be responsible, detail-oriented, and have a proven ability to manage money. The duties of an executor are time-consuming. The administration of an estate can sometimes take years to complete. Therefore, when choosing your executor, it’s important to choose a person who not only will be able to shoulder these responsibilities, but who also will likely live long enough to complete their responsibilities. As this Forbes article states,… [Read More]
Georgia Probate Attorney: Estate Planning to Avoid Potential Probate Disputes
As an Atlanta estate planning and probate attorney, I have had many clients who found themselves tangled up in familial discord because of the lack of proper estate planning done by their parents or other family members. The probate process can be difficult and stressful and can often result in feuds between family members if an estate is complicated or if the estate was not planned well. If you would like to know what happens in the probate process for an intestate estate (the estate of a person who died without a will), you can read my previous blog post on the matter. I discuss in this blog some ways to plan your estate and write your will so that your family can avoid lengthy probate proceedings as much as possible – and hopefully avoid conflict. One way to avoid ambiguity in your estate plan that may lead to familial conflict is to designate bank accounts which you intend to give to a specific family member as “payable on death” (POD) or “transferrable upon death” (TOD). A POD/TOD bank account pays out upon your death only to the specific person named as beneficiary on the account. This type of bank… [Read More]
Atlanta Probate Lawyer: The Challenges of Heirs Property
As an Atlanta probate attorney, I have a lot of experience with navigating issues which arise from a type of property called “heirs property.” Heirs property is “home or land that has been passed from generation to generation in such a way that multiple people own the same piece of property” (Georgia Heirs Property Law Center). This can happen either because a deceased person left the property to multiple people in their will, or because the deceased person died intestate, causing the property to be passed automatically to their heirs-at-law. The multiple owners of heirs property are “tenants in common,” which means they all have a share of rights to the use, possession, interest, rent, etc. of the property (Georgia Bar Journal). Heirs property is an issue which presents a plethora of challenges for the owners of such a property. One common and significant problem inherent with heirs property is “clouded title,” meaning that because of the undocumented nature of the succession of heirs property, it is often not clear on the property’s title who exactly owns the property and what rights they have with the property (Georgia Bar Journal). Therefore, it is typically necessary for all co-tenants of a… [Read More]
Atlanta Probate Attorney: The Trouble with Joint Accounts
In my Georgia probate practice, I have had several clients who were left in an uncomfortable predicament during probate due to the deceased’s use of a type of bank account called a joint account. Joint accounts are accounts with multiple owners, usually two. The money in the account is considered the property of the person who contributed the money to the account. However, each joint owner has unfettered access to the funds in the account, and does not need the knowledge or consent of the other owner to conduct transactions on the account. Upon the death of one joint owner, all the funds in the account become the property of the other joint owner. The funds do not pass through probate, meaning they are not considered part of the decedent’s estate to be distributed among the beneficiaries regardless of the instructions left in the deceased’s will, which is where the trouble with joint accounts typically begins. Other than among spouses, joint accounts are terrible planning tools. It is natural that, upon a person’s death, he or she will want to leave control and ownership of an account to a spouse, and you rarely see litigation against a spouse that was… [Read More]
Atlanta Probate Lawyer: S-Town as an Example of the Importance of Making a Will
As an Atlanta probate lawyer, I am very familiar with the consequences that can follow when a person dies intestate (i.e., without a will). The process of divvying up assets without a will to guide the process can become long, messy, and painful. A culturally relevant example of the unfortunate consequences of not preparing a will is the very popular podcast S-Town. S-Town follows the story of John B. McLemore, a resident of a small town in Alabama who owned acres upon acres of land, cared for his mother with dementia, and was rumored to have a large sum of money to his name in the form of gold bars. Following the death of McLemore by suicide, and the realization that McLemore had no will, his assets (and what was to become of his mother) were up in the air. During his life, he had verbally promised gold, money, property, etc. to friends. But without a will, these promises were not legally binding. S-Town explores the difficulties experienced by both the distant family members and McLemore’s friends in probating the estate without a will to guide the court. Although not every estate’s tale is quite so dramatic, it is important to have a… [Read More]
Atlanta Probate Attorney: Guess Who Gets Assets When There Is No Will
As an Atlanta probate lawyer, I am always representing clients who must administer an estate without a Will. In Georgia, when a person dies without a Will (i.e., dies intestate), the state legislature has decided how her estate will be divided. The legislature passed a statute that identifies the heirs-at-law of an intestate decedent and the amount each heir-at-law is entitled to. The following persons are entitled to a share of the intestate decedent’s estate in the following shares: If the decedent was married without children: entire estate to spouse. If the decedent was married with children: estate divided evenly among spouse and children*, except that spouse receives no less than 1/3. To illustrate, if the decedent was married and had one child, the spouse and child each would receive 1/2 of the estate, but if the decedent was married and had three children, the spouse would receive 1/3 of the estate, and the three children would split the remaining 2/3 of the estate. If the decedent had children but was not married (was either single, divorced, or widowed): estate divided equally among children. If the decedent was not married and had no children: estate divided among living parents. If… [Read More]
